Joining us from New York is Michael Hudson. Michael is a Distinguished Research Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri, Kansas City. His latest book is Killing the Host: How Financial Parasites and Debt Bondage Destroy the Global Economy. Michael, thanks again for joining us.
MICHAEL HUDSON: Its good to be here, but we cant get out of the woods.
BROWN: Okay, lets get into that. The IMF report on financial stability says, in spite of banks being stronger now than before the economic crisis of 2007-2008, about twenty-five percent of US banks and about a third of European banks are too weak to even benefit from a potential rise in interest rates and any recovery aid, should the global economy take a downward turn. But before we get into any specific questions about the health of banks, Michael, are we still in a recession or are we firmly in a recovery now?
HUDSON: We are not in a recovery and were not really in a traditional recession. People think of a business cycle and a boom as followed by a recession and then there are automatic stabilizers that revive the economy, but this time, we cant revive. And the reason is that every recovery since 1945 has begun with a higher, and higher, and higher level of debt. And the debt is so high now that since 2008 weve been in what I call, debt deflation. Theres people that have to pay so much money to the banks that they dont have enough money to buy the goods and services they produce. So theres not new investment, theres not new employment, markets are shrinking, and people are defaulting, and the companies cant pay the banks.
The banks product is debt. They try to tell customers that debts are good for you but the customers cant afford any more debt so theres no way the banks can continue their current business plan. In fact, theres no way that banks can be paid. Thats what the IMF doesnt follow through its analysis in saying look, the banks are broke because the financial system is broke and the financial system is broke because the whole idea of trying to get rich by running into debt doesnt work and it was all a false model. So really, at the end of long cycle that began in 1945, loading the economy with debt and were not going to be able to get out of it until you write down the debts. And thats what the IMF thinks is unthinkable. It cant say that because its supposed to represent the interest of the banks so all it can say is, Gee, the banks wont make money even if there is a recovery. But there isnt a recovery because people have to pay the banks and its all a vicious circle and, basically, theyre throwing up their hands and they dont know what to do.
BROWN: Well, Michael, help us to figure out why has growth been so weak over these past eight to six years, or so.
HUDSON: Well, if you take the average family budget, and Ive said this on your show, many times and we can go through the numbers again. If you have to pay about forty to forty-three percent of your income for housing, if you have to pay fifteen percent of your paycheck for the FICA, social security wage withholding, you have to pay medical care, you have to pay the banks debt, you have to pay your credit card debt, student loans, then youre only gonna have about twenty-five or thirty-five percent, maybe one-third of your salary. Thats all you can do to buy goods and services. But the way you get a job is by going to a company that sells goods and services. And the companies arent hiring. The consumers dont have enough money to buy the goods and services.
Were in a chronic debt-deflation. Theres no way we can recover unless you write down the debts. And thats what the IMF basically is implying but its not spelling it out because thats not what is said in polite company.
BROWN: Michael the headline from MarketWatch about this IMF report, it reads, Forget too big to fail. The big concern is banks too weak to survive. If big banks almost capsized the global financial system, are weaker banks actually better for consumers?
HUDSON: Banks that are very narrow and do what banks used to do, before President Clinton abolished Glass-Steagall in 1999. Small banks that lend to consumers are fine. Most banks, Deutsche Bank is at the top of the spectrum here, banks that have decided, well, we cant make money lending to barbers anymore so were going to the second business plan, were going to lend money to casino capitalists. That is, were going to lend money to people who wanna gamble on derivatives. Now, a derivative is a bet whether a stock, or a bond, or a real estate is going to go up or down. Theres a winner and a loser, its like betting on a horserace. So the biggest bank lending for gambles, not for real production, not for investment, but just for gambles, was Deutsche Bank. So the borrowers borrowed from Deutsche Bank to gamble. Whats the best gamble in the world, right now? Its betting if Deutsche Bank stock is going to go down. All the short sellers borrowed money from their banks to place bets that Deutsche Bank stock is gonna go down. Now, its ringing its hands and saying, oh the speculators are killing us. But its Deutsche Bank and the other banks that are providing all the money to the speculators to bet on credit.
BROWN: Michael, the IMF report says that in the Eurozone, if the Eurozone governments could help banks dump bad loans, it would have a positive effect on bank capital. What would be the effect on consumers in the EU economy, at large, if banks were able to just dump these bad loans?
HUDSON: Its really very simple mathematics. You have to abolish pension plans. You have to abolish all social spending. You have to raise taxes. You have to have, at least, fifty percent of the European population emigrate, either to Russia or China. You would have to have mass starvation. Very simple. Thats the price that the Eurozone thinks is well worth paying. Its the price that it thought Greece is worth paying. To save the banks, you would have to turn the entire Eurozone into Greece. Youll have to have the governments sell off all of their public domains; sell off their railroads, sell off their public land. Youll have to, essentially, introduce neo-feudalism. Youll have to roll the clock of history back, a thousand years, and reduce the European population to debt slavery. Simple solution. Its a solution that the Eurozone has imposed on Greece. And its a solution that the leaders and the banks are urging for responsible economists to promote for the population, at large.
BROWN: Lets talk about the other little nugget of information released by the IMF about debt. Global debt has now reached about a hundred and fifty-two trillion dollars. This includes government debt, household debt, non-financial firms debt. What does all this debt mean for the global financial system and for everyday people here, Michael?
HUDSON: It means that the only way people can repay the debt is by cutting their living standards very drastically, but agreeing to shift their pension plans from defined benefit plans, when you know what youre going to get, into just defined contribution plans, where you put money in like a roach motel and you dont know whats coming out. Youll get rid of social security, for governments. It means youll, essentially, abolish government and turn it over to the banking system to run with an idea that the role of governments is to extract income from the economy to pay to the bondholders and the banks. When you say paying the banks, what they really mean is paying the bank bondholders. Which are, basically, the one percent. What youre really seeing right now in the IMF report, in this growth of debt, is the one percent of the population owns maybe three-quarters of all this debt. This means that theres a choice. Either you can save the economy, or you can save the one percent from losing a single penny. And every government, from the Obama administration, right through to Angela Merkel, the Eurozone and the IMF say, were gonna save the banks, not the economy. No price is too high to pay to try to make the system go a little bit longer, a little bit longer. But the fact is that ultimately it cant be saved, because of the mathematics that are involved. Debts grow, and grow, and grow. And the more they grow, the more they shrink the economy and when you shrink the economy, you shrink the ability to pay the debts, so its all an illusion. The question is how long are people going to be willing to live in this illusion?
BROWN: That was my next question for you. Not only how long are people going to be able to live in this illusion but how much longer is this illusion actually sustainable before we see another collapse of economies around the world? Is this something that is impending, that we should just be expecting to come, we should be readying ourselves for this?
HUDSON: Were still in the same collapse that began after 2008. Theres not a new collapse, there hasnt been any recovery. Wages for the ninety-nine percent have gone down, steadily, since 2008. Theyve gone down, especially, for the bottom twenty-five percent of the population. Theyve gone down, especially, for Blacks and Hispanics and for blue collar workers. Their net worth has actually turned negative. And they dont have enough money to get by. In fact, one of the big consulting firms just did a study of the millennials. Ernst and Young did a study and they found seventy-eight percent of millennials are worried about not having enough good paying job opportunity to pay off their student loans. Seventy-four percent cant pay the health care if they get sick. Seventy-nine percent dont have enough money to live when they retire. So, already, were having a whole generation thats coming on, not only here but also in Europe, that isnt able to get jobs and the only way it can live is if they have rich enough parents who have given them a trust fund.
BROWN: Weve been speaking with Michael Hudson. Michael is a Distinguished Research Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri, Kansas City. His latest book is Killing the Host: How Financial Parasites and Debt Bondage Destroy the Global Economy. Michael, you said you had another book coming out, is that right?
HUDSON: Yes, later this month. Itll be J is for Junk Economics. And its a review of why the economists promise that somehow well recover. Why this is basically junk and why in order to be an economist these days, you have to participate in this fairytale that somehow we can recover and still make the banks rich. And its a fairytale. And J is for Junk Economics is about why it wont work.
— സ്രോതസ്സ് therealnews.com
Nullius in verba
ആരുടേയും വാക്ക് വിശ്വസിക്കരുത്
ലാഭേച്ഛയില്ലാതെ പ്രവര്ത്തിക്കുന്ന ഒരു സ്വതന്ത്ര ജനകീയ മാധ്യമമാണ് നേരിടം. ഈ പ്രവര്ത്തനത്തില് താങ്കളുടെ സഹായവും ആവശ്യമുണ്ട്. അതിനാല് ഈ ജനകീയ മാധ്യമത്തിന്റെ നിലനില്പ്പ് ആഗ്രഹിക്കുന്ന താങ്കള് കഴിയുന്ന രീതിയില് പങ്കാളികളാവുക.
To read post in English:
in the URL, after neritam. append wordpress. and then press enter key.